<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flickr Seems to be Caught in Lie Over Obama Joker Image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techpolitik.com/2009/08/27/flickr-seems-to-be-caught-in-lie-over-obama-joker-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techpolitik.com/2009/08/27/flickr-seems-to-be-caught-in-lie-over-obama-joker-image/</link>
	<description>Where Politics and Technology Intersect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:28:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flickr DMCA Takedown Policy Changes &#171; TechPolitik</title>
		<link>http://www.techpolitik.com/2009/08/27/flickr-seems-to-be-caught-in-lie-over-obama-joker-image/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr DMCA Takedown Policy Changes &#171; TechPolitik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techpolitik.com/?p=52#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] is obviously in direct response to the dustup over its removal of the Obama-as-Joker image, which we still seem to not know who made the copyright infringement claim. When it was found that it was likely that the claim was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is obviously in direct response to the dustup over its removal of the Obama-as-Joker image, which we still seem to not know who made the copyright infringement claim. When it was found that it was likely that the claim was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Oswald</title>
		<link>http://www.techpolitik.com/2009/08/27/flickr-seems-to-be-caught-in-lie-over-obama-joker-image/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Oswald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techpolitik.com/?p=52#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Ben, good point. Typically in touchy PR situations like this, my experience has been that the company and the PR person will work closely in order to ensure something like what you explain doesn&#039;t happen -- because in the end, that could look even worse. 

Either way, you&#039;re bringing up a good point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, good point. Typically in touchy PR situations like this, my experience has been that the company and the PR person will work closely in order to ensure something like what you explain doesn&#8217;t happen &#8212; because in the end, that could look even worse. </p>
<p>Either way, you&#8217;re bringing up a good point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Atkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techpolitik.com/2009/08/27/flickr-seems-to-be-caught-in-lie-over-obama-joker-image/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Atkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techpolitik.com/?p=52#comment-31</guid>
		<description>When Heather posted the comment about DMCA, was she in a position to give an official statement on it, or was she just a customer service rep trying to field a P. R. question? It seems that they could argue that she was incorrect, but that when they released the official statement citing &quot;copyright concerns&quot; they were acting under the TOS, not the DMCA, and therefore their official P. R. has their story right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Heather posted the comment about DMCA, was she in a position to give an official statement on it, or was she just a customer service rep trying to field a P. R. question? It seems that they could argue that she was incorrect, but that when they released the official statement citing &#8220;copyright concerns&#8221; they were acting under the TOS, not the DMCA, and therefore their official P. R. has their story right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
